You Paid For It: Pinellas property owners draw line in the sand against beach renourishment project

PINELLAS COUNTY, Fla. (WFLA) — To keep its mid-county beaches in tip-top shape, Pinellas County is planning a $36.5 million beach renourishment project funded mostly with federal tax dollars through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Beachfront property owners from Clearwater to North Redington Beach must voluntarily agree to the project for the plan to move forward, but they have failed to sign 63 out of the 120 required easements.

“We don’t trust the government,” said Ron Gonzalez who represents the Gulf Mariner Condominium Association.

When the Army Corps of Engineers starts replenishing a nine-mile stretch of Sand Key at the end of this year, they will likely have to hop-scotch past a number of sections to create a patchwork of restored beaches and skip 1.2 miles of beachfront due to balking land owners. They will skip any section that has less than a 1500 foot long stretch of signed easements. “I wish we could fill those areas but we can’t fill 100, 200 foot lots,” said Pinellas County coastal manager John Bishop. “That’s too small of an area.”

Bishop says the emotional groundswell of citizen opposition at recent public meetings caught him and other renourishment architects by surprise. “We’re not planning on doing anything differently than we did in previous years,” Bishop said. “We’re just trying to build the same project we always have.”

A federal law, put on the books in 1986, requires beachfront property owners to sign easements “in perpetuity” to guarantee public access, after millions of dollars of tax money is spent to improve their beachfront, but the Army Corps didn’t begin enforcing that law until trouble emerged during beach renourishment in New Jersey after Hurricane Sandy.

Now dozens of angry and rebellious property owners in Pinellas County have railed against that policy as a “state’s rights” issue and a fundamental violation of their property rights. “That’s correct,” Gonzalez said. “They’re taking over our property.”

Gonzalez and a number of his Redington Shores neighbors are ready to risk losing everything in a major hurricane if that’s what it takes to keep the Corps and Pinellas County from dictating what they can or cannot do with their private stretch of beach sand above the mean high water line. “We’re not going to give our rights away,” Gonzalez said.

One of Gonzalez’ concerns is that the government may decide to build protective dunes in front of Gulf Mariner and block his beach front view if his condo association cedes control through the easement.

“Dunes are good but it infringes on our property rights and the value of our homes,” Gonzalez said.

Meanwhile Pinellas County’s coastal erosion scientists who are planning the massive beach restoration project in partnership with the Army Corps warn that homeowners and business owners who refuse renourishment are putting themselves in inevitable danger of ending up water lapping up against their seawalls due to ever-present erosion from Mother Nature. “If we stop doing that the beach could recede,” Bishop said.”It was that way in 1985 before we began nourishing.”

“If we stop doing that the beach could recede,” Bishop said.”It was that way in 1985 before we began nourishing.”

Gonzalez insists there is already plenty of sand in front of his Redington Shores condominium and if severe erosion occurs, property owners can reconsider their options.”They told us its a 50-year project,” Gonzalez said. “They can come back later.”

Watch our story tonight at 6 pm to see why landowners are drawing a line in the sand and giving up millions of dollars worth of free sand that You Paid For.


BACK TO TOP STORIES provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others and keep the conversation on topic and civil. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s